Thread:Tnpir4002/@comment-55052-20130208225812/@comment-55052-20130209003537

Thanks for the response and for taking the time to explain. Sorry that you've had to explain things again, but I (like others, I am sure) haven't really delved into everything you probably have commented on or explained in various areas and forums on the Web.

This is not meant to be harsh or a criticism, but some of us haven't had the luxury of time or focus to follow these things too closely. (My case, as an example: we have had over 11,000 earthquakes in the last 2 1/2 years here, several devastating. People we know have lost their lives, or loved ones, or moved away because they have lost everything.  We nearly lost our business and we have been working hard to rebuild it. Only 20% of our CBD will be still standing by the time demolition finishes, whenever it does finish. See  if you want to know more.) I know it's hard to explain things over and over again sometimes; I help run a school, so it happens to me too.

With things the way they are, it's just easier for me to delve into a film and not do a massive amount of research first... I honestly did message you more in response to the featured article nominations and the surprise to see my name in the credits at the end of the first movie.

Like I said before, I have just watched Star Trek I: Specter of the Past, which is pretty much my first experience of your take on Star Trek (other than responding to a casting call).

I admire all the work and time you have put into this triology, and I look forward to watching the other two films when I get a bit more free time (I had to break the film up into 4 days' worth of viewing). And, again, if you need assistance or advice on the article, or decide you'd like me to record my lines or another part's lines, I'm fine with that (no worries either way) as long as I have a little time to prepare if you want me to. :)

Thanks for responding and hope you are well! :)