Before I go any further with this, I'd like some input. How should we list the various ASDB websites? There's trekships.org, asdb.net, and a few others.
And how should we reference things from Chris Wallace's tech manuals - like his version of Ships of the Star Fleet - in articles? --TimPendragon 18:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- You mean as articles, or as mentions in other articles? If we're going to have articles for those terms (hence links) (ex. [[trekships.org]]), I'm thinking, OTTOMH, "[[ASDB (trekships.org)|Advanced Starship Design Bureau]]" (using the example). (In fact, a template would be good for this.)
- For the second, how about [[Ships of the Star Fleet (Wallace)|Ships of the Star Fleet]]? Doesn't have to be my way, though. Just suggesting.
Also, for the "ASDB (website)" link... if there's more than one, perhaps that should be (websites). – Sasoriza Adm • Tlk 18:51, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- You're right. Given that, should it be a disambiguation page linking to the others or should we just list all the ASDB sites in different sections on one page?
- Reference templates would be a great idea for this. ADSB1, ADSB2, etc? Or ADSBnet, ADSB-EAS (since TrekShips.org is affiliated with Ex Astris Scientia)? Or something else? --TimPendragon 20:07, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- It should be a disambig if there's sufficient content on those others. Otherwise, I say put 'em all on one page. Don't need a bunch more stubs lying around. As always they can be split off into separate pages if the one page gets too cumbersome.
- I think you mean ASDB? Yeah, that sounds good; let's see what we can whip up. We can tweak 'em as we go. I just did one for SotSF (Wallace). – Sasoriza Adm • Tlk 14:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)