Hi all, there is significantly more information on the Memory Alpha Oberth class article than this one, with information on the bridge, etc. Do we want to include this or not get too in-depth about it? --usscantabrian 01:08, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- For this, and most articles on canon subjects, I don't think we should go into great detail at all. If people want to look up information on the Oberth-class, say if they're writing a fic or planning an RPG, then I'm sure they'll look at Memory Alpha. We only need the bare bones here, which will make fan-created data all the more prominent when its added. --TimPendragon 01:19, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Cool... that was my thinking, and thank God I didn't second guess myself and add the information. :) --usscantabrian 01:37, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's a good rule of thumb for just about any canon article. For us, less is more. ;-) --TimPendragon 01:38, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- So I shouldn't include Worf's pet tribble Sparky in his article then? Damn. LOL --usscantabrian 01:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's a good rule of thumb for just about any canon article. For us, less is more. ;-) --TimPendragon 01:38, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Cool... that was my thinking, and thank God I didn't second guess myself and add the information. :) --usscantabrian 01:37, 26 December 2007 (UTC)