FANDOM


(Characters)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
:No one has any thoughts on this? I think we should have two listings. One for "Canon" and the other for "STNV". Thoughts? --[[User:Sneg|Sneg]] 20:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 
:No one has any thoughts on this? I think we should have two listings. One for "Canon" and the other for "STNV". Thoughts? --[[User:Sneg|Sneg]] 20:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 
::Sounds like a good idea to have two listings. It would probably avoid confusion --[[User:The NCC Factor|The NCC Factor]] 20:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 
::Sounds like a good idea to have two listings. It would probably avoid confusion --[[User:The NCC Factor|The NCC Factor]] 20:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  +
:Maybe we should just add additional sections to the normal character like what's done when a fic involves a canon character. As far as I can tell, this doesn't change the character at all but extends it and therefore shouldn't have its own article. --[[User:Kevin W.|Kevin W.]] 20:43, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:43, October 3, 2006

Characters

How do you think the characters should be listed (as a wiki link)?

Jame Kirk or James Kirk (NV) or something else?

That way there is no confusion between the "orginal" Kirk and the "new" Kirk.

Thoughts? --Sneg 18:41, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

No one has any thoughts on this? I think we should have two listings. One for "Canon" and the other for "STNV". Thoughts? --Sneg 20:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Sounds like a good idea to have two listings. It would probably avoid confusion --The NCC Factor 20:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Maybe we should just add additional sections to the normal character like what's done when a fic involves a canon character. As far as I can tell, this doesn't change the character at all but extends it and therefore shouldn't have its own article. --Kevin W. 20:43, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.