is there really a need to list all the ranks here? i prefer the earlier presentation. -- Captain M.K.B. 22:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- I put all of the ranks just so there are links to all of the ranks. I do the same thing for all of the pages, even if it's just a few {{?}}s and some '''''N/A'''''s. It's just a matter of inclusiveness. --Kevin W. Adm•Tlk 22:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure its called for Kevin. It made one line of the ranks take up 12 lines of the table, and it makes us have to put more empty boxes in the table than there are actually graphics.
- I'd rather have the entire table fit on one screen so that you can take in the rank set as a whole. -- Captain M.K.B. 22:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
2250s[]
Considering that the rank style presented here doesn't actually match the 2250s, should we remove the link? --Kevin W. Adm•Tlk 06:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- we have some sources where these ranks were used in the 2250s, the EV comic "The Fires of Pharos" for example. -- Captain M.K.B. 05:15, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Differentiating between admirals[]
Mike, you don't have to do this, but I have a suggestion. Maybe, as a way to differentiate between the different grades of admiral, you could add vertical stripes on the inside of the triangle. Just a suggestion. --Kevin W. Adm•Tlk 19:29, 5 February 2007 (UTC)